Comparison of different colistin regimens for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

H.-M. Cui, X. Lin, Y.-Y. Liu, Y.-H. Shen

Department of Hospital Infection Management, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China. shy3040@163.com

---

• Infectious Diseases

OBJECTIVE: Multidrug-resistant pneumonia is a common cause of hospital-related morbidity and mortality across the world. The high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pneumonia due to resistant gram-negative pathogens has led to a re-introduction of colistin. The adverse events associated with intravenous colistin can be alleviated by administering the drug nasally (i.e., inhalation) or in a combination including both inhalation and intravenous presentations of the drug. A review study compared the impact of these administration methods on clinical, morbidity, and mortality-related outcomes in patients with multiple-drug resistant pneumonia. However, the publication of newer cohort trials, warrants an update of the state of the evidence. To compare the clinical, morbidity, and mortality outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving either intravenous colistin or combined drug presentations (ie, inhaled and intravenous).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the academic literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE). We conducted a random-effect meta-analysis to compare outcomes such as rate of clinical cure, microbiological eradication, nephrotoxicity, and overall mortality in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving either intravenous colistin, inhaled colistin, or a combination of those administration routes.

RESULTS: From 963 studies, we found 16 eligible studies with 1651 patients (61.6 ± 7.7 years) with multidrug-resistant pneumonia who had received either intravenous, inhaled colistin or a combined inhaled/intravenous administration. Our meta-analysis revealed higher rates of clinical cure (OR, 1.61) and microbiological eradication (1.37) in patients receiving combined intravenous/inhaled colistin than in those receiving intravenous colistin alone. Additional analyses revealed higher rates of nephrotoxicity (1.30) and mortality (1.44) in patients receiving intravenous colistin than in those receiving combined intravenous/inhaled colistin.

CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence showing improved clinical, morbidity, and mortality outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving inhaled colistin or combined inhaled/intravenous colistin than those receiving intravenous colistin alone. These findings should help clinicians stratify the risks associated with different colistin administration routes to manage multidrug-resistant pneumonia.

 

Free PDF Download